November 2nd, 2008

The fad that is Twilight...

One word: Overrated.

Simply put, that’s how I would assess the whole fuss about Stephenie Meyer’s “Twilight”.

What got me reading in the first place was that tagline they used to promote the movie, saying that Twilight is “the hottest thing since Harry Potter”…

Oooowwwkei….they dared make the slightest comparison, so naturally I was very curious to find out if it really made sense to compare the two or if it is just another marketing strategy. 

After reading Twilight, I figured that yeah, it is another marketing strategy and that the comparison was referring to the movies rather than the books.

Because, honestly, the Twilight series can in no way, be compared to JK Rowling’s Harry Potter series. Puhlease.

 Twilight: The Book

 Good points first.

The book is really easy to read.

The story is told based on one person’s point of view.

The narration is simple and there are not a lot of complications. Just the fact that Bella, the main female character of the story started to fall in love with a “super hot” guy named Edward; well, the guy here turns out to be a vampire.  Bella is drawn to Edward’s mystery and mainly his “super hot” looks…Believe me, she’ll make sure that you know how hot Edward is on every page (and how she really loves it when Edward “smiles his crooked smile” for goodness’ sake!!!!)

 And this is where the problem starts.

It’s like hearing one girl rant about her crush.  It’s repetitive and bordering on obsession.  Surely, you will get tired of all that. Not to mention the fact that she’s ready to give up everything in order to stay with this guy forever, even if it means giving up her humanity or selling her soul to the devil probably.  She might as well have ‘love is blind” written on her forehead; her reaction when she learns that Edward is a vampire is irrational by fiction’s standards.

 If you’re looking for a strong-willed female character in Bella, you’ll be disappointed.  Instead, what you will find is a clumsy girl who struggles even to keep her feet on the ground…the proverbial damsel in distress.   As one reader described her, she is a “vessel for reader self-insertion”.

 As for the other characters, we can only guess what deeper motivations they have…

 And the plot? My goodness…Quite predictable.

It would have been more dramatic if the chapter on Edwards’s confession on how he became a vampire happened in a more symbolic or dramatic setting rather than his car.  =(

I was really waiting to be moved…but unfortunately it didn’t come.

 I guess, this whole fad is not really for me.  I probably would have enjoyed this one if I read it during my grade school days, but then again I had a dose of vampire stories then courtesy of Francine Pascal’s Sweet Valley series (to which I now realize, I can compare Twilight with…lol)

 Twilight- The Movie

Don’t get me wrong (yeah right…haha), I think the movie would fare well.

Why? Because they weren’t as faithful to the book in their movie adaptation.

 First, they changed the mood of the movie…Bella’s discovery of Edward’s real identity in the movie is a bit more suspenseful. Her reaction more believable as she seems to have doubts and fears (a more realistic reaction than submitting to it in a matter-of-fact kind of way- like was how it was in the book).

 Second, the setting…ahhh, the setting…In the trailer, we see can see that the “confession” part happened in a forest, and Bella here was more confrontational and not dreamily staring at Edward’s face ready to believe everything he said even before he says it. =P

Lastly, James and Edward’s fight scene was included in the movie…Whereas in the book, our damsel in distress unfortunately passed out so the action scenes weren’t part of her narration (Bella is such a killjoy&hellip.  Nothing like two vampires strangling each other to boost the entertainment value of the movie, right?

 Well, so much for a Rowling or Tolkien moment for Stephenie Meyer and me….

I probably would read the series anyway.

Are you kidding me? I’m a certified pop culture junkie!

But don’t expect me to put Twilight or Stephenie Meyer for that instance, on a pedestal…

Side note:

The books cover art is quite cool though. =)

And the official single from the movie’s soundtrack is Decode by Paramore…hot! (like Edward Cullen…duhr?!)

Some reader reactions from people who rode the Twilight bandwagon on the comparison between Harry Potter and Twilight:

  • A lot of people recommended the Twilight series to me after I finished Deathly Hallows and I’ve read all three books in that series. To be honest, I’m not all that fond of them. The Twilight books read like a self-insert for teenage girls. The writing is melodramatic and tedious. There is a description about how “hot” the main vampire character (Edward) is on practically every page. Everyone, and I do mean everyone, happens to fall in love with the clumsy main female character (the self-insert).

  • I CANNOT fathom how this series got so popular. The Twilight story reads like the “Mary-Sue” fanfics people are always complaining about. The characters are cookie-cut outs and stereo-typical.

  • It doesn’t come close to Harry Potter but it seems a lot of HP fans migrated to that fandom after DH to fill up the hole HP left.

            Posted by Julie on April 10, 2008, 09:38 PM

  • Twilight is really the story of a girl stringing along a couple of chumps (albeit vampire and werewolf chumps). These types of stories are typically very popular with girls. The HP series has a more universal appeal.

        It’s kind of like comparing New Kids on the Block to the Beatles.

Posted by Protego! on April 10, 2008, 09:41 PM

  • I’ve gotta agree with Julie and Protego. The Twilight series is an overly saturated romance novel. I can’t believe people actually enjoy reading it. What an insult to the Harry Potter series that people compare the two.

Posted by Emma on April 10, 2008, 09:47 PM

  • While the Twilight books are mildly entertaining, they aren’t even in the same universe as the Harry Potter books. Twilight is a “Sweet Valley High” style romance with a minimum of real plot. There is no comparison in any way, shape, or form.

Posted by Bunney on April 10, 2008, 10:41 PM

  • Twilight is not a series that will be read to our great-great-grandchildren for generations to come. It’s a temporary teenage-girl phenomenon because everyone wants Edward as their boyfriend. lolPosted by Libby on April 10, 2008, 10:49 PM

  • It’s sad, then, that one of the inadvertent messages of the Twilight series is an unfortunate one: That it’s fine for a teenaged girl to let her “one true love” lock her up ‘for her safety,’ save her butt at each turn, and basically give up everything and everyone for him. Bella is a vessel for reader self-insertion, as someone said above, and she needs to get some backbone and gumption (I almost typed ‘spunk,’ fyi. But I think that means something totallllly different in other countries than it does in America. hahaha).

Posted by diasphora on April 11, 2008, 12:06 AM

  • I don’t even know why the Twilight Fandom is so big. Meyer’s writing is so poor, she needs to repeat a high school creative writing class. There is absolutely no depth to her plot, characters, or themes. It’s just a book written for a movie. Artless. Shallow.

  • Twilight is glorified fan fiction about a bunch of whiny teenagers…It’s like Harry’s emo!angst from OotP magnified x 10000000 on every page. Sprinkle in some serious Mary Sue and there you go. You’ve got Twilight.

Posted by hodgepodge at 04:31 AM | 3 burst asunder...

October 23rd, 2008

twilight-what's the fuss?

i admit i haven't been aware of Twilight by Stephenie Meyer.

if not for the "the hottest thing since Harry Potter" tagline that they used to promote the movie, i wouldn't have paid attention.

if they have the guts to compare it to the Harry Potter series (which i really am a fan of), I have to find out why.

first thing I did was to google for "Twilight".  Wikipedia.com had a brief plot summary of all 4 books, so I went ahead and read it.

Basically, it's a story of a mortal falling in love with a vampire...

And instantly, I am reminded of Francine Pascal's Sweet Valley High series.  I have a copy of the "vampire series" where Jessica Wakefield falls head over heels in love with a guy who turned out to be a vampire...hehe!

I went over to one of the Harry Potter sites to find out what they thought of the comparison between the Twilight series and the Potter series.  I pretty much got mixed reactions. 

Some fans said that Twilight got a lot of attention because Harry potter fans were looking for an alternative after JK Rowling finished off the Potter series...Some said that the Twilight books were incomparable to Harry Potter and dismissed it as some sort of a romance novel that Potter fans dwelled on because they were frustrated that JK Rowling did not put too much focus on the "romantic" content of her books...Others loved Twilight but were ready to admit that it didn't come close to reading Harry Potter...And a few just dismissed any comparison whatsoever, reasoning out that the two books are altogether different and therefore does not merit any comparison.

Some of the reviews for "Breaking Dawn (the final book of the series, I think), however, made me think twice...Wikipedia reports:

Breaking Dawn has received generally negative reviews. Publisher's Weekly stated that the main problem was that "Essentially, everyone gets everything they want, even if their desires necessitate an about-face in characterization or the messy introduction of some back story. Nobody has to renounce anything or suffer more than temporarily--in other words, grandeur is out."[10] In an article by The Associated Press journalist Sara Rose posted on NewsOK.com wrote that fans of the series would love "engaging characters, great humor, a distracting obsession with beauty, focus on the minutiae of emotions", however "casual readers may be disappointed with a lot of build-up and little action."[11] Entertainment Weekly graded Breaking Dawn with a D, criticizing the birth scene and Bella's "unwavering passion for Edward" and having no other goals.[12] Denise Martin of the Los Angeles Times wrote that "Stephenie Meyer is no J.K. Rowling" and that in the "final chapters, in which both authors really swung for the epic, Meyer’s bunted."[13] The Washington Post also responded with a negative review, making comments such as, "...Meyer has put a stake through the heart of her own beloved creation," and, "Breaking Dawn has a childbirth sequence that may promote lifelong abstinence in sensitive types."[14

So instead of buying the book, i downloaded the pdf file..safe and economic...haha...

Me being a pop culture junkie, I just have to read it. 

Post script:

So I'm already reading the book, and i was quite surprised to see that part of the whole research on the subject of Vampires included a Philippine myth.  Stephenie Meyer wrote in Chapter 7: Nightmare:

"The rest of the site was an alphabetized listing of all the different myths of vampires held throughout the
world. The first I clicked on, the Danag, was a Filipino vampire supposedly responsible for planting taro
on the islands long ago. The myth continued that the Danag worked with humans for many years, but the
partnership ended one day when a woman cut her finger and a Danag sucked her wound, enjoying the
taste so much that it drained her body completely of blood.
"

I'm from the Philippines but I'm not even familiar with this one...hehe.

Posted by hodgepodge at 09:06 AM | WHaT sAy YoU?!

May 3rd, 2008

"The Hobbit"...Soon on the Bigscreen!!!

Yahoo! reported that Ian McKellen will most likely play Gandalf, again,
on the film adaptation of JRR Tolkien's "THE HOBBIT"!

Yes!
After the amazing LOTR Trilogy, New Line and MGM together with Warner Brothers will be coming out with not just one but TWO Hobbit films!!!! waaaaahhhh!!!!!

(^^,)/ yey!!!!!

Just the thought of it gives me goosebumps!

Though Peter Jackson will not be directing the film, he'll be co-producing it, so fellow fans of the LOTR Trilogy movies need not fret, Jackson will surely inject a lot of his genius into the Hobbit movies too!

thehobbit.blog.com reports:

The two “Hobbit” films – “The Hobbit” and its sequel – are scheduled to be shot simultaneously, with pre-production beginning as soon as possible. Principal photography is tentatively set for a 2009 start, with the intention of “The Hobbit” release slated for 2010 and its sequel the following year, in 2011.

2010?! hmmm....it's not that far off, I'm sure it'll be worth the wait. =)

Guillermo del Toro (“Pan’s Labyrinth,” “Hellboy,” “Blade 2&rdquo will direct “The Hobbit” and its sequel...

Del Toro will move to New Zealand for the next four years to work with Jackson and his Wingnut and WETA production teams. He will helm the two films back to back – telling the story of “The Hobbit,” and its sequel, which will deal with the 60-year period between “The Hobbit” and “The Fellowship of the Ring,” the first of the “Lord of the Rings” trilogy.

New Line is overseeing development and will manage the production. “The Hobbit” and its sequel are being co-produced and co-financed by New Line Cinema and MGM, with Warner Brothers distributing domestically and MGM distributing internationally. Peter Jackson and Fran Walsh are executive producing the films.

***

This is really one movie event to look forward to, because personally, after the LOTR movies, I haven't really seen any worthy adaptations of its kind... A lot of the stuff which came out during the past few years have fallen short of our expectations... Eragon, The Golden Compass and even Narnia's "The Lion, the Witch and The Wardrobe" seemed to have tried...( I am not gonna include Harry Potter on the list because it'll have "BIASED" written all over it...hehe...)

But LOTR definitely is on a league of its own...As for me, you can't really go inside a movie house these days and expect an awe-inspiring LOTR moment, you'd just be left underwhelmed...

It's a good thing to have something to look forward to...

I am just sooooo excited!!!! Middle Earth rocks!!!! hihi...

Posted by hodgepodge at 02:05 PM | WHaT sAy YoU?!

April 18th, 2008

Your Call...

 

Your Call (Secondhand Serenade)

Waiting for your call, I'm sick, call I'm angry
call I'm desperate for your voice
Listening to the song we used to sing
In the car, do you remember
Butterfly, Early Summer
It's playing on repeat, Just like when we would meet
Like when we would meet

I was born to tell you I love you
and I am torn to do what I have to, to make you mine
Stay with me tonight

Stripped and polished, I am new, I am fresh
I am feeling so ambitious, you and me, flesh to flesh
Cause every breath that you will take
when you are sitting next to me
will bring life into my deepest hopes, What's your fantasy?
(What's your, what's your...)

I was born to tell you I love you
and I am torn to do what I have to, to make you mine
Stay with me tonight

And I'm tired of being all alone, and this solitary moment makes me want to come back home
(I know everything you wanted isn't anything you have)

I was born to tell you I love you
and I am torn to do what I have to, to make you mine
Stay with me tonight

I was born to tell you I love you
and I am torn to do what I have to, to make you mine
Stay with me tonight
(I know everything you wanted isn't anything you have)
Currently feeling: emo
Posted by hodgepodge at 08:31 AM | WHaT sAy YoU?!
« Newer | »